Found in search. Answered by AI. Cited by name.
We do the work. You get the customers.
What we track: your Google rank, and whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews cite you. Reported every month.
Not three separate projects. We look at your whole picture and build one bespoke strategy to win all three.
Search
AI answers
AI citations
How every engagement runs. Audit, fix, grow, measure. You always know what shipped and what moved.
Everything the work produces, shipped to your site. You own all of it, with us or without us.
A scored audit of your whole search presence. Every gap named and ranked by impact. Yours to keep, whether we do the work or your team does.
Schema and rewritten pages, shipped to your site. Built for Google's rich results and written so ChatGPT and Perplexity can quote them clean.
Your llms.txt and AI crawler policy, live on the site. The instructions AI engines read before they decide to cite you.
A monthly report, in plain numbers. Your rankings and AI citations, tracked in one place you can actually read.
Real rankings and AI citations from client work. And growing.
KGS is Singapore's leading e-waste recycling company. We rebuilt the site and ran SEO, AEO, and GEO on it. Here is what changed.
One client, shown in full. We would rather go deep on real work than pad a wall of logos.
Investment, timeline, and scope at a glance. The brief call settles the rest.
Foundational work, shipped.
Teams who want the foundations laid right, not a PDF audit to file and forget.
Full programme, shipped.
Brands who want the studio to think with them on positioning and ship the whole programme.
Ongoing growth and advisory.
Brands serious about AI search positioning and classic search share of voice. Monthly support, monthly strategy.
Not sure where to start? Send the URL and a few queries you want to win. We'll come back with a scoped audit and a number.
Common questions. If yours isn't here, email us.
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is the practice of optimizing content so AI search engines discover, cite, and quote it. The engines that matter are ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Bing Copilot. The work covers schema.org structured data, passage-level content (134 to 167 word citable blocks with definition-first openers), llms.txt and crawler policy, and brand mention growth across Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Wikipedia. Mentions correlate around three times more strongly with AI citations than backlinks (Ahrefs 75k-brand study, December 2025).
Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) is the practice of structuring content so AI answer boxes use it as the answer. The surfaces that matter are Google AI Overviews, featured snippets, and the direct replies from ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Bing Copilot. The work is clear question-and-answer formatting, FAQ schema, and self-contained passages a machine can lift in one block. AEO overlaps with GEO: AEO is about being the answer, GEO is about being cited by name as the source.
Each engine weights its sources differently. ChatGPT leans on Wikipedia and Reddit, Perplexity leans heavily on Reddit, and Google AI Overviews mostly cite pages already ranking in the top 10. Bing Copilot relies on the Bing index. The shared signals across all four are brand entity strength, structured data, quotable passages, content recency, and inbound mentions.
Yes. Google AI Overviews cite from top-10 Google rankings 92% of the time. If you do not rank in classic search, you do not get cited in the AI Overview either. Traditional SEO is the floor. GEO is the ceiling. The technical foundations (crawlability, schema, internal linking, page speed) serve both. The content tactics diverge. &7 runs both in one programme.
SEO gets you ranked in classic search like Google and Bing. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) gets your content used as the answer in AI answer boxes and Google AI Overviews. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) gets you cited by name in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Bing Copilot. The technical foundations overlap (schema, content quality, crawlability). The tactics diverge. We run all three in one programme.
Technical fixes show up in Google within days. Ranking improvements typically land in 8–16 weeks for competitive queries. AI citations move faster once llms.txt and passage-level content are in place, often inside 4 weeks for branded queries. We report monthly so the curve is visible from week one.
Our work starts at SGD 2,000. A one-off Foundation audit with quick-win fixes runs SGD 2,000 to 3,000. A full build-out (schema, content rewrites, AI engine setup) starts at SGD 3,000. Ongoing monthly growth and advisory runs SGD 1,500 to 3,000 a month, with a three-month minimum. Every engagement starts with a scoped audit and a fixed number, so there are no surprises.
No, and nobody honest does. Google and the AI engines are moving targets. What we guarantee is the work: shipped fixes, shipped schema, shipped llms.txt, shipped content. Plus measurement that shows whether the work moved the numbers. If it didn't, we say so and adjust.
Yes. We work on WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, Sanity, Contentful, and custom Next.js sites. Schema and llms.txt are platform-agnostic. Passage rewrites go through whatever CMS workflow you already run. Technical fixes ship as PRs against your repo or as patches your developer can apply.
It will. The engines update citation logic, llms.txt support, and crawler policy on their own schedule. The monthly retainer covers staying current: re-running citation tests, updating the policy file, rewriting passages when the rules shift. SEO and GEO are not set-and-forget work.
See exactly where you rank, where AI cites you, and what to fix first. A scoped audit and a fixed number come back inside a week.
Or see the other services →